|
|
Re: Matheology § 162
Posted:
Nov 28, 2012 1:47 AM
|
|
On 28 Nov., 00:00, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:
> In article
> <4a99d304-a967-43d9-9f96-d1f798e94...@dz6g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>,
>
> WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
> > On 27 Nov., 21:48, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > Correct. Every position is unoccupied,
>
> > > My claim is *each* position is unoccupied.
>
> > That's correct. But it does not follow that all positions are
> > unoccupied.
>
> Name one position in front of the point which will, in the limit, not be
> occupied by a zero!
Positions are enumerated by natural indices. According to finished
infinity of matheology all indices have wandered to the right hand
side. Hence I cannot name any position.
Regards, WM
|
|
