Virgil
Posts:
4,482
Registered:
1/6/11
|
|
Re: Matheology � 162
Posted:
Nov 28, 2012 2:05 AM
|
|
In article
<eab7c7dc-cf60-4f4a-ab36-b1c1461b6195@dg10g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>,
WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
> On 28 Nov., 00:00, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:
> > In article
> > <4a99d304-a967-43d9-9f96-d1f798e94...@dz6g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>,
> >
> > WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
> > > On 27 Nov., 21:48, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > > Correct. Every position is unoccupied,
> >
> > > > My claim is *each* position is unoccupied.
> >
> > > That's correct. But it does not follow that all positions are
> > > unoccupied.
> >
> > Name one position in front of the point which will, in the limit, not be
> > occupied by a zero!
>
> Positions are enumerated by natural indices. According to finished
> infinity of matheology all indices have wandered to the right hand
> side. Hence I cannot name any position.
Then you have openly conceded that you, as well as others, are are both
governed and controlled by what you denigrate as "matheology", which
makes it more powerful than your Wolkenmuekenheim, which does not
govern or control any one or anything but WM.
--
|
|
