|
|
Re: From Fermat little theorem to Fermat Last Theorem
Posted:
Nov 28, 2012 10:14 AM
|
|
On Wednesday, November 28, 2012 4:09:43 PM UTC+2, Frederick Williams wrote:
> John Jens wrote:
>
> >
>
> > Corrections was made.
>
> >
>
> > It's sufficient that only a < p.
>
> >
>
> > If a + b â câ ¥0 because 0<aâ ¤b<c implies b â c < 0 ,0 â ¤ a + b â c < a < p
>
> > If a + b â c = 0 see (1)
>
> > If a + b â c â ¥ 1 and because a + b â c < a implies a â ¥ 2 and because a < p implies
>
> > p > 2.
>
>
>
> May I urge to stick to 7 bit ASCII?
>
>
>
> --
>
> When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by
>
> this sign, that the dunces are all in confederacy against him.
>
> Jonathan Swift: Thoughts on Various Subjects, Moral and Diverting
Corrections was made.
It's sufficient that only a < p.
If a + b - c>=0 because 0<a<=b<c implies b - c < 0 , 0 <= a + b - c < a < p
If a + b - c = 0 see (1)
If a + b - c >= 1 and because a + b - c < a implies a >= 2 and because a < p implies
p > 2.
|
|
