|
|
Re: Matheology § 162
Posted:
Nov 28, 2012 1:13 PM
|
|
On 27.11.12 21:25, WM wrote:
> On 27 Nov., 19:52, Carsten Schultz <schu...@zedat.fu-berlin.de> wrote:
>> Surely set theory must be to blame for this!
>
> We have infinitely many digits left to the point in the limit when
> calculated by analysis.
>
> We have no digits left to the point in the limit when calculated by
> set theory.
>
So this time you do not claim that I am wrong, you just repeat your
nonsense.
> This seems to suggest that set theory is not suitable (or willing in
> this special case) to calculate the limit, or analysis is wrong.
Or what you write is just idiotic.
|
|
