trj
Posts:
75
From:
Korea
Registered:
2/23/12
|
|
Re: Matheology § 162
Posted:
Nov 29, 2012 6:56 PM
|
|
YBM wrote:
> Le 29.11.2012 22:49, WM a écrit :
> >> I've not studied the extended reals. I am aware
> that oo is an element of
> >> them. But, is it called a "number" in that case?
> >
> > It is not of interest how it is called. But if some
> one calls it a
> > number, like Cantor who even talked about integers
> (ganze Zahl) then
> > it is called a number.
>
> You are a disgusting and stupid crank, WM.
If it is really true that Cantor did "extend" the reals by adding
an element oo which is a number, then it seems that it is
Cantor who is the stupid one.
But perhaps WM is lying?
-trj
|
|
