The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Matheology S 162
Replies: 7   Last Post: Nov 30, 2012 5:00 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]

Posts: 18,076
Registered: 1/29/05
Re: Matheology S 162
Posted: Nov 30, 2012 4:36 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On 30 Nov., 04:11, "Jesse F. Hughes"

> > But a real crackpot stamping with feet and shouting "there is the set
> > containing all naturals" will impress some other crackpots. No one
> > else.

> Sure.  Aside from the fact, you know, that ZFC proves there is a set of
> natural numbers.

That's because even silliest claims, when called axioms, have to be
worshipped by the community of matheologians.

Regards, WM

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.