Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math.independent

Topic: Induction is Wrong
Replies: 8   Last Post: Nov 30, 2012 5:55 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Brian Q. Hutchings

Posts: 5,637
Registered: 12/6/04
Re: Induction is Wrong
Posted: Nov 30, 2012 4:19 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

yes, left us to interpret "number" as "naturals."

I didn't know that the 4-tetragon [*] theorem did not apply
to negative integers, though, although I wouldn't
have supposed that!

what is the exceptional form of natural,
that is not the sum of three second-powers --
4^n + something, and is there any geometrical model
for those?


* hey; when you mean, second-powering,
then you might say, "second-powering" ...
an old shibb of Are Buckafka Fullofit.

> commutative ring (such as Z) which fails to satisfy the
> 4-squares theorem is a model of GA.




Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.