The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Matheology S 162
Replies: 7   Last Post: Nov 30, 2012 5:00 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]

Posts: 8,833
Registered: 1/6/11
Re: Matheology S 162
Posted: Nov 30, 2012 5:00 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

In article
WM <> wrote:

> On 30 Nov., 04:11, "Jesse F. Hughes"

> > > But a real crackpot stamping with feet and shouting "there is the set
> > > containing all naturals" will impress some other crackpots. No one
> > > else.

> >
> > Sure.  Aside from the fact, you know, that ZFC proves there is a set of
> > natural numbers.

> That's because even silliest claims, when called axioms, have to be
> worshipped by the community of matheologians.

Of which community WM is the premier and only resident.

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.