Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Topic: Matheology S 162
Replies: 7   Last Post: Nov 30, 2012 5:00 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Virgil

Posts: 8,833
Registered: 1/6/11
Re: Matheology S 162
Posted: Nov 30, 2012 5:00 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

In article
<54892532-4d8d-48fc-97be-15df72a3bc27@ib4g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>,
WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

> On 30 Nov., 04:11, "Jesse F. Hughes"
>

> > > But a real crackpot stamping with feet and shouting "there is the set
> > > containing all naturals" will impress some other crackpots. No one
> > > else.

> >
> > Sure.  Aside from the fact, you know, that ZFC proves there is a set of
> > natural numbers.

>
> That's because even silliest claims, when called axioms, have to be
> worshipped by the community of matheologians.


Of which community WM is the premier and only resident.
--





Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.