quasi
Posts:
12,062
Registered:
7/15/05


Re: From Fermat little theorem to Fermat Last Theorem
Posted:
Dec 2, 2012 6:14 AM


John Jens wrote:
>Finished !!!!!!!!! :) > >http://primemath.wordpress.com/
You're an idiot.
Several responders have alerted you to the fact that your proof is fatally flawed, and yet you obliviously post proof after proof, all with the same blatant error.
Your proof fails almost right away. I'll quote from your latest version:
>Fermat?s little theorem states that if p is a prime number, >then for any integer a, the number a^p is an integer >multiple of p. > > a^p = a(mod p)
However Fermat's little Theorem doesn't force a < p.
For example, using a = 4, p = 3, we have
a^p = a (mod p)
but a is not less than p.
>Assume that a,b,c naturals and p prime and > > 0 < a <= b < c
Ok so far.
> and a < p
Stop right there  you can't justify a < p.
Moreover, there's no repair  your proof is dead.
quasi

