Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Topic: On Generalizing the Natural Numbers
Replies: 5   Last Post: Dec 2, 2012 4:27 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Graham Cooper

Posts: 4,336
Registered: 5/20/10
Re: On Generalizing the Natural Numbers
Posted: Dec 2, 2012 2:46 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On Dec 3, 5:33 am, Charlie-Boo <shymath...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > numbers when added to 4 are less than 10?
>
> > Herc
>
> (eA)ADD(4,x,A) ^ LT(A,10)
>


But this isn't a set unless you are using EXIST to add syntactic
sugar.

R(I,x) <=> { x | R(I,x) }

And you're swapping between = with sets of answers (or intersection)
and ^ in predicate format.

How do you write using {} format - the set of numbers when added to 4
are less than 10.

You can't combine your 2 formatting methods to do this.


Herc




Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.