In article <email@example.com>, WM <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Matheology § 170 > > The infinite triangle formed by the sequence > > 0.1 > 0.11 > 0.111 > ... > > has height aleph_0 but width less than aleph_0 (because the limit 1/9, > the first line with aleph_0 digits, does not belong to the triangle). > This lack of symmetry is disturbing for a physicist.
In order to be a mathematically valid triangle, your figure would have to have a last line, which means that you must be claiming that there is a largest natural number corresponding to that last line, which is not only disturbing to real physicists but also to real mathematicians. --