Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Linear independence of eigenvectors
Replies: 7   Last Post: Dec 6, 2012 1:17 PM

 Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
 Robin Chapman Posts: 412 Registered: 5/29/08
Re: Linear independence of eigenvectors
Posted: Dec 6, 2012 4:09 AM

On 05/12/2012 17:43, David C. Ullrich wrote:
> On Wed, 05 Dec 2012 16:11:21 +0000, José Carlos Santos
> <jcsantos@fc.up.pt> wrote:
>

>> Hi all,
>>
>> A classical Linear Algebra exercise says: prove that _n_ eigenvectors
>> of an endomorphism of some linear space with _n_ distinct eigenvalues
>> are linear independent. Does this hold for modules over division rings?

>
> I believe so - I don't see where the standard proof uses
> commutattivity, or however one spells it.
>
> Say x_1, ... x_n are eigenvectors wrt disctinct eigenvalues
> l_j. Say
>
> sum c_j x_j = 0.
>
> Applying that endomorphism k times shows that
>
> sum c_j l_j^k x_j = 0
>
> for k = 0, 1, ... . Hence
>
> sum c_j P(l_j) x_j = 0
>
> for any polynomial P.

I think you are unconsciously assuming commutativity here.
If your polynomials have coefficients over the division
ring you can't push them through the c_j. It works for
polynomials with coefficients in the centre of your division
ring, but such polynomials won't split up the eigenvectors.
Over H one cannot find a real polynomial with f(i) = 0
and f(j) nonzero. This gives a clue to finding a counterexample.
Take your favourite real matrix with characteristic
polynomial X^2 + 1. Over H its eigenvalues include i, j and
k (and a lot more...).

Date Subject Author
12/5/12 Jose Carlos Santos
12/5/12 David C. Ullrich
12/6/12 Jose Carlos Santos
12/6/12 David C. Ullrich
12/6/12 Robin Chapman
12/6/12 David C. Ullrich
12/5/12 Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
12/6/12 Jose Carlos Santos