In article <firstname.lastname@example.org>, WM <email@example.com> wrote:
> On 5 Dez., 19:48, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote: > > > WM has already adequately demonstrated to the world again and again that > > he does not speak for mathematicians > > Is aleph_0 a quantity (i.e. possibly in trichotomy with other > quantities) or not?
Not to those who, as in the case of WM, deny that it can be properly defined as a cardinality or ordinality.
But not everyone is so negatively oriented towards such things as general definitions of cardinality and ordinality as WM is. --