In article <firstname.lastname@example.org>, WM <email@example.com> wrote:
> On 6 Dez., 10:36, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote: > > In article > > <cc5c24a4-0ec4-4f48-8b90-9463aed1b...@o6g2000yql.googlegroups.com>, > > > > WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote: > > > On 5 Dez., 19:48, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote: > > > > > > WM has already adequately demonstrated to the world again and again that > > > > he does not speak for mathematicians > > > > > Is aleph_0 a quantity (i.e. possibly in trichotomy with other > > > quantities) or not? > > > > Not to those who, as in the case of WM, deny that it can be properly > > defined as a cardinality or ordinality. > > > > But not everyone is so negatively oriented towards such things as > > general definitions of cardinality and ordinality as WM is. > > -- > > So, to you it is a quantity? Then we can put the question whether the > lengths of the sides of my triangle can be in trichotomy. There is an > angle of 45° and its sides have length 1*aleph_0 = aleph_0 and > sqrt(2)*aleph_0 = aleph_0. Now my question: Is the third side aleph_0 > or less or larger?
Until you can show that those alleged "sides" have endpoints other that that alleged common point, you question assumes conditions contrary to fact. --