Search All of the Math Forum:
Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by
Drexel University or The Math Forum.
|
|
|
|
Re: Matheology � 173
Posted:
Dec 7, 2012 12:01 PM
|
|
"WM" <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote in message
news:7a358140-b9a6-40b8-aa2d-89c48cfb198e@4g2000yqv.googlegroups.com...
>Matheology § 173
>
>The question of language is also particularly relevant, for Brouwer
>would continue to emphasize that mathematics does not depend on
l>anguage or logic, being prior to language and logic. Language is
>merely an instrument of social domination, and it makes impossible a
>real communication: nobody has ever communicated his soul to someone
>else by means of language.
......... and you continue using your "language", shame !
> In 1908, this line of thought would derive
>into a denounce of classical logic and of axiomatic systems, which
>obviously from his standpoint cannot be the real foundation of
>mathematics. [...] Brouwer stressed that he had been elaborating these
>ideas since 1907,
.........at the height of Dadaizm
>Regards, WM
.......you should cut and paste from textbooks.
|
|
|
|
