Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Topic: Matheology § 173
Replies: 1   Last Post: Dec 7, 2012 12:01 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Scott Berg

Posts: 2,014
Registered: 12/12/04
Re: Matheology � 173
Posted: Dec 7, 2012 12:01 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

"WM" <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote in message

>Matheology § 173
>The question of language is also particularly relevant, for Brouwer
>would continue to emphasize that mathematics does not depend on

l>anguage or logic, being prior to language and logic. Language is
>merely an instrument of social domination, and it makes impossible a
>real communication: “nobody has ever communicated his soul to someone
>else by means of language.”

......... and you continue using your "language", shame !

> In 1908, this line of thought would derive
>into a denounce of classical logic and of axiomatic systems, which
>obviously from his standpoint cannot be the real foundation of
>mathematics. [...] Brouwer stressed that he had been elaborating these
>ideas since 1907,

.........at the height of Dadaizm

>Regards, WM

.......you should cut and paste from textbooks.

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum 1994-2015. All Rights Reserved.