Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Matheology § 170
Replies: 41   Last Post: Dec 8, 2012 5:35 PM

 Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de Posts: 18,076 Registered: 1/29/05
Re: Matheology § 170
Posted: Dec 7, 2012 12:49 PM

On 6 Dez., 21:29, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:
> In article
>
>  WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

> > On 6 Dez., 11:07, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:
>
> > > > Two *sides* with an angle defined by these sides define a triangle.
>
> > > Not unless both sides have endpoints other than the one they share.
> > > And in WM's whatever-it-is, neither side has one.

>
> > It is not enough that all points are present?
>
> It would be, but the critical ones aren't!

How can the critical points be missing if *all* pojnts are thereß
>
>
>

> > > > We have one side of lenght 1*aleph_0 and the other side of length
> > > > sqrt(2)* aleph_0.

>
> > > Aleph_0 may be either an ordinality or a cardinality, dependent on
> > > usage, but is never a "length".

>
> > A unit lenght 1 times aleph_0 is what?
>
> Nonsense!

A unit times aleph_0 is aleph_0. But I agree. It is really nonsense.

Regards, WM