On 7 Dez., 22:28, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote: > In article > <3f5b25b6-ae3f-4a92-96dc-49f872d0c...@c16g2000yqi.googlegroups.com>, > > WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote: > > Correct. That is a valuable recognition! But an infinity that is less > > than a larger infinity forces to believe in such crap. > > So you now publicly admit that your whole "triangle" thing is crap! > --
As its existence depends on actual infinity it is obviously a crap. But this implies, by contraposition, that actual infinity is a crap. - Quod erat demonstrandum (as Euclid never said).