On 7 Dez., 22:53, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:
> > Just that can be constructed by one angle and two complete sides. > > I note that WM acknowledges that those sides are required to be > COMPLETE, But in his example they are not, since they both lack > endpoints at their other (not in common) ends.
Interesting. But you believe that the natural numbers form a complete set without an endnumber?