On 11/25/2012 04:38 PM, Graham Cooper wrote: > On Nov 26, 3:24 am, George Greene <gree...@email.unc.edu> wrote: >> On Nov 24, 3:38 pm, Graham Cooper <grahamcoop...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> You argue logically until you're shown wrong, >> >> If the argument is logical then IT CAN'T be "shown wrong". >> >>> then quote scripture as backup. >> >> I'm not doing anything as a backup. A proof is a proof. >> If you read it and aren't convinced, then it's a proof of AN >> ADDITIONAL thing: YOU'RE STUPID. >> >>> You have never supported one single assertion in 10 years on your own. >> >> So FUCKING what?? >> The fact that somebody else figured something out before I did does >> not make it LESS true! >> More to the point, if I thought I had figured it out on my own, BUT >> NOBODY ELSE WAS CONVINCED, >> that probably WOULD make it less true! That is certainly the dynamic >> that applies in your personal case. >> >>> Keep starting out that window, and give other people a chance to >>> contribute before you trash every single thread in sci.logic with >>> scripture. None of it holds up, PERIOD. >> >> It all holds up. The fact that you don't understand WHY it holds up >> is why you get attacked all the time. >> > > No use arguing with liars, cheaters and stealers. > > Nothing that makes all it's practitioners run and hide every time a > flaw is posted "holds up" by any standard. > > How do you evaluate an uncountable function? > > Herc >
"The body of crime they controlled was known as the Mathia."
from: The Adventures of Discriminant Boy In The Negative Dimension, Prequel 1: The Best Lives of All;