On 9 Dez., 15:28, Charlie-Boo <shymath...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Dec 8, 4:40 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote: > > > On 8 Dez., 10:41, Zuhair <zaljo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > So what I'm saying here is that a > > > theory like ZFC is not "Essentially" about mathematics, it is not even > > > a piece of mathematics, it is a LOGICAL theory. > > > On the contrary, ZFC is a deeply unlogical theory. > > ZFC can't even represent the integers.
In that case I would be satisfied and let ZFC with those who like it for reasons which they may know. But they again and again try to spread the rumor that ZFC has some meaning for mathematics or even is the basis of mathematics. And that must be rejected by all means.