In article <email@example.com>, WM <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On 9 Dez., 15:28, Charlie-Boo <shymath...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Dec 8, 4:40 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote: > > > > > On 8 Dez., 10:41, Zuhair <zaljo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > So what I'm saying here is that a > > > > theory like ZFC is not "Essentially" about mathematics, it is not even > > > > a piece of mathematics, it is a LOGICAL theory. > > > > > On the contrary, ZFC is a deeply unlogical theory. > > > > ZFC can't even represent the integers. > > In that case I would be satisfied and let ZFC with those who like it > for reasons which they may know. But they again and again try to > spread the rumor that ZFC has some meaning for mathematics or even is > the basis of mathematics. And that must be rejected by all means.
Just like Creationists must reject Evolution by all means. including lies, propaganda campaigns, ad hominem attacks, etc. --