Search All of the Math Forum:
Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by
NCTM or The Math Forum.


Math Forum
»
Discussions
»
sci.math.*
»
sci.math
Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.
Topic:
Matheology § 176
Replies:
10
Last Post:
Dec 11, 2012 12:33 AM




Matheology § 176
Posted:
Dec 10, 2012 4:23 AM


Matheology § 176
Here's a paradox of infinity noticed by Galileo in 1638. It seems that the even numbers are as numerous as the evens and the odds put together. Why? Because they can be put into onetoone correspondence. The evens and odds put together are called the natural numbers. The first even number and the first natural number can be paired; the second even and the second natural can be paired, and so on. When two finite sets can be put into onetoone correspondence in this way, they always have the same number of members.
Supporting this conclusion from another direction is our intuition that "infinity is infinity", or that all infinite sets are the same size. If we can speak of infinite sets as having some number of members, then this intuition tells us that all infinite sets have the same number of members.
Galileo's paradox is paradoxical because this intuitive view that the two sets are the same size violates another intuition which is just as strong {{and as justified! If it is possible to put two sets A and B in bijection but also to put A in bijection with a proper subset of B and to put B in bijection with a proper subset of A, then it is insane to judge the first bijection as more valid than the others and to talk about equinumerousity of A and B.}}
[Peter Suber: "Infinite Reflections", St. John's Review, XLIV, 2 (1998) 159] http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/writing/infinity.htm#galileo
Regards, WM



