The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » Education » math-teach

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: College Is Dead. Long Live College!
Replies: 1   Last Post: Dec 10, 2012 8:53 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
GS Chandy

Posts: 8,307
From: Hyderabad, Mumbai/Bangalore, India
Registered: 9/29/05
Re: College Is Dead. Long Live College!
Posted: Dec 10, 2012 3:37 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

Thanks, Professor Becker, for posting that exciting story by Amanda Ripley in TIME (pasted for reference below my signature. I was in particular drawn to:
> In every country, education changes so slowly
> that it can be hard to detect progress. But what
> happened next was truly different. Within an
> hour, Maziar Kosarifar, a young man taking the
> class in Malaysia, began posting detailed
> descriptions for Niazi of the test questions in
> each video. Rosa Brigída, a novice physics
> professor taking the class from Portugal, tried
> to create a workaround so Niazi could bypass
> YouTube; it didn't work. From England, William,
> 12, promised to help and warned Niazi not to
> write anything too negative about her government
> online.
> ...

Something different seems to be 'in the air'...

Education can change - and (given the enthusiastic participation of its primary stakeholders, the students - it can change very speedily indeed! And: if education can change, so can a lot of other societal systems...


Jerry Becker posted Dec 10, 2012 5:14 AM
> ********************************
> From Time Magazine, Thursday, October 18, 2012.
> See
> -live-college/#comments
> ********************************
> College Is Dead. Long Live College!
> By Amanda Ripley
> On Sept. 17, the Pakistani government shut down
> access to YouTube. The purported reason was to
> block the anti-Muslim film trailer that was
> inciting protests around the world.
> One little-noticed consequence of this decision
> was that 215 people in Pakistan suddenly lost
> their seats in a massive, open online physics
> course. The free college-level class, created by
> a Silicon Valley start-up called Udacity,
> included hundreds of short YouTube videos
> embedded on its website. Some 23,000 students
> worldwide had enrolled, including Khadijah Niazi,
> a pigtailed 11-year-old in Lahore. She was on
> question six of the final exam when she
> encountered a curt message saying "this site is
> unavailable."
> ----------------------------------
> SIDEBAR: Can Online Mega Courses Change
> Education? -- See
> education/
> ----------------------------------
> Niazi was devastated. She'd worked hard to master
> this physics class before her 12th birthday, just
> one week away. Now what? Niazi posted a lament on
> the class discussion board: "I am very angry, but
> I will not quit."
> In every country, education changes so slowly
> that it can be hard to detect progress. But what
> happened next was truly different. Within an
> hour, Maziar Kosarifar, a young man taking the
> class in Malaysia, began posting detailed
> descriptions for Niazi of the test questions in
> each video. Rosa Brigída, a novice physics
> professor taking the class from Portugal, tried
> to create a workaround so Niazi could bypass
> YouTube; it didn't work. From England, William,
> 12, promised to help and warned Niazi not to
> write anything too negative about her government
> online.
> None of these students had met one another in
> person. The class directory included people from
> 125 countries. But after weeks in the class,
> helping one another with Newton's laws, friction
> and simple harmonic motion, they'd started to
> feel as if they shared the same carrel in the
> library. Together, they'd found a passageway into
> a rigorous, free, college-level class, and they
> weren't about to let anyone lock it up.
> By late that night, the Portuguese professor had
> successfully downloaded all the videos and then
> uploaded them to an uncensored photo-sharing
> site. It took her four hours, but it worked. The
> next day, Niazi passed the final exam with the
> highest distinction. "Yayyyyyyy," she wrote in a
> new post. (Actually, she used 43 y's, but you get
> the idea.) She was the youngest girl ever to
> complete Udacity's Physics 100 class, a
> challenging course for the average college
> freshman.
> That same day, Niazi signed up for Computer
> Science 101 along with her twin brother Muhammad.
> In England, William began downloading the videos
> for them.
> High-End Learning on the Cheap
> The hype about online learning is older than
> Niazi. In the late 1990s, Cisco CEO John Chambers
> predicted that "education over the Internet is
> going to be so big, it is going to make e-mail
> usage look like a rounding error." There was just
> one problem: online classes were not, generally
> speaking, very good. To this day, most are dry,
> uninspired affairs, consisting of a patchwork of
> online readings, written Q&As and low-budget
> lecture videos. Many students nevertheless pay
> hundreds of dollars for these classes - 3 in 10
> college students report taking at least one
> online course, up from 1 in 10 in 2003 - but
> afterward, most are no better off than they would
> have been at their local community college.
> Now, several forces have aligned to revive the
> hope that the Internet (or rather, humans using
> the Internet from Lahore to Palo Alto, Calif.)
> may finally disrupt higher education - not by
> simply replacing the distribution method but by
> reinventing the actual product. New technology,
> from cloud computing to social media, has
> dramatically lowered the costs and increased the
> odds of creating a decent online education
> platform. In the past year alone, start-ups like
> Udacity, Coursera and edX - each with an
> elite-university imprimatur - have put 219
> college-level courses online, free of charge.
> Many traditional colleges are offering classes
> and even entire degree programs online. Demand
> for new skills has reached an all-time high.
> People on every continent have realized that to
> thrive in the modern economy, they need to be
> able to think, reason, code and calculate at
> higher levels than before.
> ---------------------------------------
> TABLE OF FREE MOOCs -- Ivy League for the
> Masses. See and scoll down
> -live-college/#comments
> ---------------------------------------
> At the same time, the country that led the world
> in higher education is now leading its youngest
> generation into a deep hole. According to the
> Federal Reserve Bank of New York, Americans owe
> some $914 billion in student loans; other
> estimates say the total tops $1 trillion. That's
> more than the nation's entire credit-card debt.
> On average, a college degree still pays for
> itself (and then some) over the course of a
> career. But about 40% of students at four-year
> colleges do not manage to get that degree within
> six years. Regardless, student loans have to be
> repaid; unlike other kinds of debt, they
> generally cannot be shed in bankruptcy. The
> government can withhold tax refunds and garnish
> paychecks until it gets its money back - stifling
> young people's options and their spending power.
> For all that debt, Americans are increasingly
> unsure about what they are getting. Three
> semesters of college education have a "barely
> noticeable" impact on critical thinking, complex
> reasoning and writing skills, according to
> research published in the 2011 book Academically
> Adrift. In a new poll sponsored by TIME and the
> Carnegie Corporation of New York, 80% of the
> 1,000 U.S. adults surveyed said that at many
> colleges, the education students receive is not
> worth what they pay for it. And 41% of the 540
> college presidents and senior administrators
> surveyed agreed with them.
> -------------------------------------
> SIDEBAR: MORE: TIME/Carnegie's Higher Education
> Poll - See
> l/?pcd=teaser)
> ------------------------------------
> Arriving at this perilous intersection of high
> demand, uneven supply and absurd prices are
> massive open online courses (endowed with the
> unfortunate acronym MOOCs), which became
> respectable this year thanks to investments from
> big-name brands like Harvard, Stanford and MIT.
> Venture capitalists have taken a keen interest
> too, and the business model is hard to resist:
> the physics class Niazi was taking cost only
> about $2 per student to produce.
> Already, the hyperventilating has outpaced
> reality; desperate parents are praying that free
> online universities will finally pop the tuition
> bubble - and nervous college officials don't want
> to miss out on a potential gold rush. The signs
> of change are everywhere, and so are the signs of
> panic. This spring, Harvard and MIT put $60
> million into a nonprofit MOOC (rhymes with duke)
> venture called edX. A month later, the president
> of the University of Virginia abruptly stepped
> down - and was then quickly reinstated - after an
> anxious board member read about other
> universities' MOOCs in the Wall Street Journal.
> One way or another, it seems likely that more
> people will eventually learn more for less money.
> Finally. The next question might be, Which people
> How the Brain Learns
> This fall, to glimpse the future of higher
> education, I visited classes in brick-and-mortar
> colleges and enrolled in half a dozen MOOCs. I
> dropped most of the latter because they were not
> very good. Or rather, they would have been fine
> in person, nestled in a 19th century hall at
> Princeton University, but online, they could not
> compete with the other distractions on my
> computer.
> I stuck with the one class that held my
> attention, the physics class offered by Udacity.
> I don't particularly like physics, which is why
> I'd managed to avoid studying it for the previous
> 38 years. What surprised me was the way the class
> was taught. It was designed according to how the
> brain actually learns. In other words, it had
> almost nothing in common with most classes I'd
> taken before.
> Minute 1: Physics 100 began with a whirling video
> montage of Italy, slow-motion fountains and boys
> playing soccer on the beach. It felt a little
> odd, like Rick Steves' Physics, but it was a huge
> improvement over many other online classes I
> sampled, which started with a poorly lit
> professor staring creepily into a camera.
> When the Udacity professor appeared, he looked as
> if he were about 12; in fact, he was all of 25.
> "I'm Andy Brown, the instructor for this course,
> and here we are, on location in Siracusa, Italy!"
> He had a crew cut and an undergraduate degree
> from MIT; he did not have a Ph.D. or tenure,
> which would turn out to be to his advantage.
> "This course is really designed for anyone Š In
> Unit 1, we're going to begin with a question that
> fascinated the Greeks: How big is our planet?" To
> answer this question, Brown had gone to the
> birthplace of Archimedes, a mathematician who had
> tried to answer the same question over 2,000
> years ago.
> Minute 4: Professor Brown asked me a question.
> "What did the Greeks know?" The video stopped,
> patiently waiting for me to choose one of the
> answers, a task that actually required some
> thought. This happened every three minutes or so,
> making it difficult for me to check my e-mail or
> otherwise disengage - even for a minute.
> "You got it right!" The satisfaction of correctly
> answering these questions was surprising. (One
> MOOC student I met called it "gold-star
> methadone.") The questions weren't easy, either.
> I got many of them wrong, but I was allowed to
> keep trying until I got the gold-star fix.
> --------------------------------------
> SIDEBAR: GRAPHIC: Degrees of Difficulty -
> Tuition keeps rising, but so does the need for
> more graduates -- See
> y/?pcd=teaser
> --------------------------------------
> Humans like immediate feedback, which is one
> reason we like games. Researchers know a lot
> about how the brain learns, and it's shocking how
> rarely that knowledge influences our education
> system. Studies of physics classes in particular
> have shown that after completing a traditional
> class, students can recite Newton's laws and
> maybe even do some calculations, but they cannot
> apply the laws to problems they haven't seen
> before. They've memorized the information, but
> they haven't learned it - much to their teachers'
> surprise.
> In a study published in the journal Science in
> 2011, a group of researchers conducted an
> experiment on a large undergraduate physics class
> at the University of British Columbia. For a
> week, one section of the class received its
> normal lecture from a veteran, highly rated
> professor; another section was taught by
> inexperienced graduate students using strategies
> developed from research into human cognition.
> Those strategies mirrored those in Udacity's
> class. The students worked in small groups to
> solve problems with occasional guidance from the
> instructor. They got frequent feedback. In the
> experimental group with novice instructors,
> attendance increased 20% and students did twice
> as well on an end-of-week test.
> Minute 8: Professor Brown explained that Plato
> had also tried (and failed) to estimate the
> earth's circumference. Brown did this by jotting
> notes on a simple white screen. Like all the
> other videos in the course, this clip lasted only
> a few minutes. This too reflects how the brain
> learns. Studies of college students have shown
> that they can focus for only 10 to 18 minutes
> before their minds begin to drift; that's when
> their brains need to do something with new
> information - make a connection or use it to
> solve a problem.
> At this point in the Udacity class, three video
> clips into the experience, about 15,000 students
> were still paying attention, according to the
> company's metrics. But that's actually high for a
> MOOC. (Since it requires little effort and no
> cost to enroll, lots of people dip in and out of
> these classes out of curiosity. Only 1 in 10 of
> those enrolled in a Udacity class typically makes
> it all the way to a course's last video.) Like
> most other online classes, it was asynchronous,
> so I could rewind or leave and come back whenever
> I wanted. This also accords with how the brain
> works: humans like autonomy. If they learn best
> late at night, they like to learn at night, on
> their own terms.
> Minute 57: After 47 fast-paced videos spliced
> with pop quizzes, I did actually know how big the
> earth was. Brown had reviewed geometry and
> trigonometry with examples from actual life. And
> when it came time to put it all together, I got
> to see him measure a shadow that formed a right
> triangle, setting up a mathematical proportion to
> calculate the circumference of the earth, just
> like an ancient mathematician.
> "Congratulations!" he said. "This is really
> incredible, what you can do now." Then he asked
> the class to send in videos of themselves
> measuring shadows. I was skeptical. Would people
> actually do this?
> Yes, they would. The first video was from a young
> woman in Tampere, Finland - a drummer who wanted
> to change her career. There she was, with yellow
> dreadlocks, measuring a shadow in a parking lot.
> Another woman submitted photos of herself
> completing the experiment in Texas, plus a poem.
> A poem! "We solve for C, and long at last/ stalk
> a route into our own past."
> The Finn cheered. "Super artistic!" Brown showed
> the poem around the Udacity office. One student
> did the experiment at 0 degrees latitude in
> Ecuador. Many more people posted questions;
> within minutes, they got detailed, helpful
> answers from other students. It was as if a whole
> pop-up learning community had materialized
> overnight, and it was strangely alive.
> Turning Down Professors
> When he was a tenured professor at Stanford,
> Sebastian Thrun, the CEO and co-founder of
> Udacity, did not teach according to how the brain
> learns. He is not proud of this fact. "I followed
> established wisdom," he says. His students, who
> were used to traditional lectures, gave him high
> marks on his course evaluations. They didn't know
> what they were missing.
> In 2011 Thrun and fellow professor Peter Norvig
> decided to put their Artificial Intelligence
> class online. But when they sampled other online
> courses, they realized that most of them were
> mediocre. To captivate students from afar, they
> would need to do something different. So they
> started planning lessons that would put the
> student at the center of everything. They created
> a series of problems for students to solve so
> that they had to learn by doing, not by listening.
> By last fall, 160,000 people had enrolled. But
> the class was not particularly inspiring - at
> first. One student complained that the software
> allowed students to try each problem only once.
> "I realized, 'Wow, I'm setting students up for
> failure in my obsession to grade them,' " says
> Thrun. So he changed the software to let students
> try and try until they got it right. He also paid
> attention to the data, and he had a lot of it.
> When tens of thousands of students all got the
> same quiz problem wrong, he realized that the
> question was not clear, and he changed it. And
> the students themselves transformed other parts
> of the class, building online playgrounds to
> practice what they were learning and even
> translating the class into 44 languages.
> Meanwhile, Thrun had told his Stanford students
> they could take the class online if they didn't
> want to attend lectures. More than three-quarters
> of them did so, viewing the videos from their
> dorms and participating as if they were thousands
> of miles away. Then something remarkable
> happened. On the midterm, the Stanford students
> scored a full letter grade higher on average than
> students had in previous years. They seemed to be
> learning more when they learned online. The same
> bump happened after they took the final.
> ------------------------------------
> SIDEBAR: MORE: Reinventing College -- SEE
> -----------------------------------
> Still, the Stanford students were not the stars
> of the class. At the end of the semester, not one
> of the course's 400 top performers had a Stanford
> address.
> The experience forced Thrun to rethink everything
> he knew about teaching, and he built Udacity upon
> this reordering of the universe. Unlike Coursera,
> another for-profit MOOC provider - which has
> partnered with dozens of schools, including
> Stanford, Princeton and, more recently, the
> University of Virginia - Udacity selects, trains
> and films the professors who teach its courses.
> Since it launched in January, Udacity has turned
> down about 500 professors who have volunteered to
> teach, and it has canceled one course (a math
> class that had already enrolled 20,000 students)
> because of subpar quality.
> Right now, most MOOC providers do not make a
> profit. That can't continue forever. Udacity will
> probably charge for its classes one day, Thrun
> says, but he claims the price will stay very low;
> if not, he predicts, a competitor will come along
> and steal away his students.
> Udacity does not offer a degree, since it's not
> an accredited university. Students get a
> ceremonial certificate in the form of a PDF.
> Grades are based on the final exam. Students who
> choose to take the final for Udacity's
> computer-science course at an independent testing
> center (for $89) can get transfer credits from
> Colorado State University-Global Campus, an
> online-only school.
> Getting more colleges to accept transfer credits
> would be nice, but in the longer term, Udacity
> aims to cut out the middleman and go straight to
> employers. This week, Udacity announced that six
> companies, including Google and Microsoft, are
> sponsoring classes in skills that are in short
> supply, from programming 3-D graphics to building
> apps for Android phones.
> Meanwhile, about 3,000 students have signed up
> for Udacity's employer-connection program,
> allowing their CVs to be shared with 350
> companies. Employers pay Udacity a fee for any
> hires made through this service. So far, about 20
> students have found work partly through Udacity's
> help, Thrun says. Tamir Duberstein, 24, who
> studied mechanical engineering in Ontario,
> recently got two job offers after completing six
> Udacity courses. He took one of the offers and
> now works at a software company in San Francisco.
> Still, it will be a long time before companies
> besides high-tech start-ups trust anything other
> than a traditional degree. That's why hundreds of
> thousands of people a year enroll in the
> University of Phoenix, which most students attend
> online. Says University of Phoenix spokesman Ryan
> Rauzon: "They need a degree, and that isn't going
> to change anytime soon."
> MOOCs vs. the College Campus
> To compare my online experience with a
> traditional class, I dropped into a physics
> course at Georgetown University, the opposite of
> a MOOC. Georgetown admitted only 17% of
> applicants last fall and, with annual tuition of
> $42,360, charges the equivalent of about $4,200
> per class.
> The university's large lecture course for
> introductory physics accommodates 150 to 200
> students, who receive a relatively traditional
> classroom experience - which is to say, one not
> designed according to how the brain learns. The
> professor, who is new to the course, declined to
> let me visit.
> But Georgetown did allow me to observe Physics
> 151, an introductory class for science majors,
> and I soon understood why. This class was
> impressively nontraditional. Three times a week,
> the professor delivered a lecture, but she paused
> every 15 minutes to ask a question, which her 34
> students contemplated, discussed and then
> answered using handheld clickers that let her
> assess their understanding. There was a weekly
> lab - an important component missing from the
> Udacity class. The students also met once a week
> with a teaching assistant who gave them problems
> designed to trip them up and had them work in
> small groups to grapple with the concepts.
> The class felt like a luxury car: exquisitely
> wrought and expensive. Fittingly, it met in a
> brand-new, state-of-the-art $100 million science
> center that included 12 teaching labs, six
> student lounges and a café. It was like going to
> a science spa.
> Elite universities like Georgetown are unlikely
> to go away in the near future, as even Udacity's
> co-founder (and Stanford alum) David Stavens
> concedes. "I think the top 50 schools are
> probably safe," he says. "There's a magic that
> goes on inside a university campus that, if you
> can afford to live inside that bubble, is
> wonderful."
> Where does that leave the rest of the country's
> 4,400 degree-granting colleges? After all, only a
> fifth of freshmen actually live on a residential
> campus. Nearly half attend community colleges.
> Many never experience dorm life, let alone
> science spas. To return to reality, I visited the
> University of the District of Columbia (UDC) - a
> school that, like many other colleges, is not
> ranked by U.S. News & World Report.
> When I arrived at the UDC life-sciences building,
> I met Professor Daryao Khatri, who has been
> teaching for 37 years and yet seemed genuinely
> excited to get to his first day of class in a new
> semester.
> "They hate physics," he said about his students,
> smiling. "You will see. They are terrified." He
> led me to his classroom, a lab with fluorescent
> lights and a dull yellow linoleum floor. His 20
> students were mostly young adults with day jobs,
> which is why they were going to school at night.
> Many hoped to go to medical school one day, and
> they needed to take physics to get there.
> Khatri started the class by asking the students
> to introduce themselves. "I took physics in high
> school," said one woman, a biology major, "and it
> was the hardest class I ever had."
> "I'm about to change that!" Khatri shouted.
> Another young woman said, "I took calculus
> online, and it was just awful." It felt more like
> a support group than a college course. Then
> Khatri detailed his rules for the class. "Please
> turn the cell phones off," he said in a friendly
> voice. "Not on vibrate. I will know. I will take
> it away. Cell phones are a big disaster for the
> science classes."
> Khatri had less than one-half of 1% of the
> students that Professor Brown had on Udacity, but
> he was helping them with many skills beyond
> physics. He was cultivating discipline and focus,
> rebuilding confidence and nurturing motivation.
> "Please complain if you aren't learning," he said
> more than once.
> After a full hour of introductions and
> expectations, Khatri started reviewing geometry
> and trigonometry so that the students would have
> enough basic math to begin. He did this in far
> more detail than Brown had on Udacity, and it was
> clear from their questions that many of the
> students needed this help. As with most other
> Americans, their math and science background was
> spotty, with big holes in important places. For
> the next hour, Khatri called on every student to
> answer questions and solve problems; just as on
> Udacity, they couldn't zone out for long.
> Three weeks later, I returned to Khatri's class.
> He was about a week behind the Udacity pace, and
> his quizzes were easier. But not a single student
> had dropped his class. And when I asked a group
> of students if they would ever take this class
> online, they answered in unison: "No way."
> At this stage, most MOOCs work well for students
> who are self-motivated and already fairly well
> educated. Worldwide, the poorest students still
> don't have the background (or the Internet
> bandwidth) to participate in a major way. Thrun
> and his MOOC competitors may be setting out to
> democratize education, but it isn't going to
> happen tomorrow.
> What is going to happen tomorrow? It seems likely
> that very selective - and very unselective -
> colleges will continue to thrive. At their best
> (and I was only allowed to witness their best,
> it's worth noting), Georgetown and UDC serve a
> purpose in a way that cannot easily be replicated
> online. The colleges in the middle, though -
> especially the for-profit ones that are expensive
> but not particularly prestigious - will need to
> work harder to justify their costs.
> Ideally, Udacity and other MOOC providers will
> help strip away all the distractions of higher
> education - the brand, the price and the
> facilities - and remind all of us that education
> is about learning. In addition to putting
> downward pressure on student costs, it would be
> nice if MOOCs put upward pressure on teaching
> quality.
> By mid-October, YouTube remained dark in
> Pakistan, and the power blinked out for about
> four hours a day at Niazi's home in Lahore. But
> she had made it halfway through Computer Science
> 101 anyway, with help from her classmates.
> Niazi loved MOOCs more than her own school, and
> she wished she could spend all day learning from
> Andy Brown. But when I asked her if she would get
> her degree from Udacity University, if such a
> thing were possible, she demurred. She had a
> dream, and it was made of bricks. "I would still
> want to go to Oxford or Stanford," she said. "I
> would love to really meet my teachers in person
> and learn with the whole class and make
> friends-instead of being there in spirit."
> ------------------------------------------------------
> ----
> Ripley, a TIME contributing writer, is an Emerson
> Fellow at the New America Foundation, where she
> is writing a book about education around the world
> *************************************************
> --
> Jerry P. Becker
> Dept. of Curriculum & Instruction
> Southern Illinois University
> 625 Wham Drive
> Mail Code 4610
> Carbondale, IL 62901-4610
> Phone: (618) 453-4241 [O]
> (618) 457-8903 [H]
> Fax: (618) 453-4244
> E-mail:

Message was edited by: GS Chandy

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.