The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Matheology § 175
Replies: 3   Last Post: Dec 10, 2012 1:54 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Scott Berg

Posts: 2,111
Registered: 12/12/04
Re: Matheology � 175
Posted: Dec 10, 2012 11:54 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

"WM" <> wrote in message
Matheology § 175

>Until then, no one envisioned the possibility that infinities come in
>different sizes, and moreover, mathematicians had no use for “actual
>infinity.” The arguments using infinity, including the Differential
>Calculus of Newton and Leibniz, do not require the use of infinite

that is wrong.

>There are only countably many names.

Wrong. a name is simply a set of letters of any number.

>Conclusion: Infinities do not come come in different sizes.


>In fact
>mathematicians have never had use for actual infinity because they
>could not.


>All they could is to believe that they had use for actual
>infinity, i. e., for numbers that have no names and cannot be used.


>That's called mathelogy.

wrong, you theory is called the deceiver.

>Regards, WM

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.