Search All of the Math Forum:
Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by
NCTM or The Math Forum.


Math Forum
»
Discussions
»
sci.math.*
»
sci.math
Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.
Topic:
Matheology § 175
Replies:
3
Last Post:
Dec 10, 2012 1:54 PM




Re: Matheology � 175
Posted:
Dec 10, 2012 11:54 AM


"WM" <mueckenh@rz.fhaugsburg.de> wrote in message news:19e8bf9ce0e040a2a2592c4185e1aa55@r6g2000yqd.googlegroups.com... Matheology § 175
>Until then, no one envisioned the possibility that infinities come in >different sizes, and moreover, mathematicians had no use for actual >infinity. The arguments using infinity, including the Differential >Calculus of Newton and Leibniz, do not require the use of infinite >sets.
that is wrong.
>There are only countably many names.
Wrong. a name is simply a set of letters of any number.
>Conclusion: Infinities do not come come in different sizes.
wrong.
>In fact >mathematicians have never had use for actual infinity because they >could not.
wrong.
>All they could is to believe that they had use for actual >infinity, i. e., for numbers that have no names and cannot be used.
wrong.
>That's called mathelogy.
wrong, you theory is called the deceiver.
>Regards, WM



