Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum


Math Forum
 Ask Dr. Math
 Discussions
 Internet Newsletter
 MathTools
 Problems of the Week
 Teacher2Teacher
 Teacher Exchange
 Workshops

Search All of the Math Forum:
Browse our Internet Mathematics Library

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math.independent

Topic: fom - 01 - preface
Replies: 18   Last Post: Dec 12, 2012 3:34 PM

Advanced Search
Reply to this Topic Reply to this Topic

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Alan Smaill

Posts: 714
Registered: 1/29/05
Re: fom - 01 - preface
Posted: Dec 10, 2012 12:24 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> writes:

> On 9 Dez., 23:40, Alan Smaill <sma...@SPAMinf.ed.ac.uk> wrote:
>> WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> writes:
>> > On 8 Dez., 23:37, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:
>> >> Aleph_0 is not a length, nor an area, nor a volume.
>>
>> > If it was a whole number or integer, as Cantor insisted, then it could
>> > be used to define a length or an area or a volume etc.
>>
>> Cantor defined it as a cardinal number;
>> he did not propose any notion of multiplication of,
>> eg real numbers by transfinite cardinals.
>
> You are badly informed.

Then please inform me;
did Cantor consider 3.14159... to be a cardinal number?
In which of Cantor's number classes does 3.14159... fall?


> Regards, WM

--
Alan Smaill

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2013. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.