> On 9 Dez., 23:40, Alan Smaill <sma...@SPAMinf.ed.ac.uk> wrote: >> WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> writes: >> > On 8 Dez., 23:37, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote: >> >> Aleph_0 is not a length, nor an area, nor a volume. >> >> > If it was a whole number or integer, as Cantor insisted, then it could >> > be used to define a length or an area or a volume etc. >> >> Cantor defined it as a cardinal number; >> he did not propose any notion of multiplication of, >> eg real numbers by transfinite cardinals. > > You are badly informed.
Then please inform me; did Cantor consider 3.14159... to be a cardinal number? In which of Cantor's number classes does 3.14159... fall?