>> On the contrary, ZFC is a deeply unlogical theory. It requires >>the belief that uncountably many elements can be distinguished >>whereas everybody knows that this is impossible even in ideal >>mathematics.
That's one of the dumbest claims that I've ever read. Don't confuse your delusions with what everybody believes.
>> Further in ZFC the sequence >> 21., 2.1, 432.1, 43.21, 6543.21, 654.321, ... >> has the limit < 1.
No; it has no limit.
>> In analysis the very same sequence has the (improper)imit oo.
>Right, for once!
No. For the sequence to have the limit oo, both lim sup and lin inf would have to be oo, not just one of them.
Unsolicited bulk E-mail subject to legal action. I reserve the right to publicly post or ridicule any abusive E-mail. Reply to domain Patriot dot net user shmuel+news to contact me. Do not reply to firstname.lastname@example.org