Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Interpretation of coefficients in multiple regressions which model
linear dependence on an IV

Replies: 146   Last Post: Dec 15, 2012 6:44 PM

 Search Thread: Advanced Search

 Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
 Ray Koopman Posts: 3,383 Registered: 12/7/04
Re: Response to your last re Q and p
Posted: Dec 11, 2012 12:44 AM
 Plain Text Reply

On Dec 10, 5:11 pm, djh <halitsk...@att.net> wrote:
> You wrote:
>
> ?But forget S-W and all the others in the list I gave. You want to be
> sensitive to what Stephens (1974) calls "alternative A", so you should
> use Q = -2*sum{ln p}. Refer Q to the chi-square distribution with df =
> 2*(the # of p's). This is a one-tailed test: the p-value for Q is the
> area in the upper tail of the chi-square distribution. For the p's
> that you sent, (Q, p) = (174.954, .00731) for e*u and (254.377,
> .870e-9) for u^2.?
>
> OK, will do. I?ll compute these before I finish the ?4-ups?.
> (However, I?d still like to eventually finish the 4-ups as well
> because for subset=S, method=N, fold=a1, set=1, the plot for u*e not
> only hit me right between the eyes, but did so strongly I was almost
> knocked out.)
>
> But one question.
>
> For getting p?s back from the t-distribution via the GNU/GSL functions
> accessible from PERL, we wound up doing this:
>
> one-tailed p = 1 - ( gsl_cdf_tdist_P( t, df )

Didn't we go into this once before? It seems familiar,
but I can't find the old posts. Anyhow, I suspect that

gsl_cdf_tdist_Q( t, df )

will get you the same thing, without having to subtract from 1,
the rule being that _P gets the lower tail and _Q gets the upper.
Also, shouldn't you be using abs( t ) ?

>
> where gsl_cdf_tdist_P is described here:
>
> http://www.gnu.org/software/gsl/manual/html_node/The-t_002ddistributi...
>
> So from what you just wrote re referring Q to the chi-sqaure
> distribution, I assume that I should do this:
>
> one-tailed p = 1 - ( gsl_cdf_chisq_Q( Q, df )

You want the upper tail, so don't subtract from 1.
Try it! Be an experimentalist, not a theoretician!

>
> where Q and df are computed as you specified and gsl_cdf_chisq_Q is
> described here:
>
> http://www.gnu.org/software/gsl/manual/html_node/The-Chi_002dsquared-...
>
> If you disagree, please let me know.
>
> Thanks very much, as always.

Date Subject Author
11/21/12 Halitsky
11/21/12 Halitsky
11/22/12 Ray Koopman
11/22/12 Halitsky
11/23/12 Ray Koopman
11/23/12 Halitsky
11/23/12 Halitsky
11/24/12 Ray Koopman
11/24/12 Halitsky
11/24/12 Halitsky
11/25/12 Halitsky
11/26/12 Ray Koopman
11/26/12 Ray Koopman
11/26/12 Halitsky
11/27/12 Ray Koopman
11/27/12 Halitsky
11/27/12 Ray Koopman
11/28/12 Ray Koopman
11/28/12 Halitsky
11/27/12 Halitsky
11/27/12 Ray Koopman
11/27/12 Halitsky
11/27/12 Ray Koopman
11/27/12 Halitsky
11/27/12 Halitsky
11/27/12 Ray Koopman
11/28/12 Halitsky
11/28/12 Halitsky
11/28/12 Ray Koopman
11/28/12 Halitsky
11/29/12 Halitsky
11/30/12 Ray Koopman
12/2/12 Ray Koopman
12/2/12 Ray Koopman
12/2/12 Halitsky
12/2/12 Ray Koopman
12/2/12 Halitsky
12/2/12 Halitsky
12/2/12 Halitsky
12/2/12 Halitsky
12/3/12 Halitsky
11/30/12 Halitsky
11/30/12 Ray Koopman
12/1/12 Halitsky
12/1/12 Ray Koopman
12/1/12 Halitsky
12/1/12 Halitsky
12/1/12 Halitsky
12/1/12 Halitsky
12/5/12 Halitsky
12/5/12 Halitsky
12/5/12 Halitsky
12/5/12 Halitsky
12/5/12 Ray Koopman
12/6/12 Halitsky
12/7/12 Ray Koopman
12/7/12 Halitsky
12/7/12 Ray Koopman
12/7/12 Halitsky
12/7/12 Halitsky
12/7/12 Halitsky
12/7/12 Halitsky
12/7/12 Halitsky
12/7/12 Ray Koopman
12/7/12 Halitsky
12/7/12 Halitsky
12/7/12 Ray Koopman
12/7/12 Halitsky
12/8/12 Ray Koopman
12/8/12 Ray Koopman
12/8/12 Halitsky
12/9/12 Halitsky
12/8/12 Halitsky
12/8/12 Halitsky
12/8/12 Halitsky
12/9/12 Halitsky
12/9/12 gimpeltf@hotmail.com
12/9/12 Halitsky
12/9/12 Halitsky
12/10/12 Ray Koopman
12/10/12 Halitsky
12/10/12 Ray Koopman
12/10/12 Halitsky
12/10/12 Halitsky
12/11/12 Ray Koopman
12/11/12 Halitsky
12/10/12 Halitsky
12/11/12 Halitsky
12/11/12 Halitsky
12/11/12 Ray Koopman
12/11/12 Halitsky
12/12/12 Ray Koopman
12/12/12 Halitsky
12/13/12 Ray Koopman
12/13/12 Halitsky
12/13/12 Ray Koopman
12/13/12 Halitsky
12/14/12 Ray Koopman
12/14/12 Halitsky
12/13/12 Halitsky
12/13/12 Ray Koopman
12/14/12 Halitsky
12/14/12 Ray Koopman
12/14/12 Halitsky
12/14/12 Ray Koopman
12/14/12 Halitsky
12/14/12 Halitsky
12/14/12 Ray Koopman
12/14/12 Halitsky
12/14/12 Ray Koopman
12/15/12 Ray Koopman
12/15/12 Halitsky
12/15/12 Halitsky
12/15/12 Ray Koopman
12/14/12 Halitsky
12/14/12 Ray Koopman
12/14/12 Halitsky
12/1/12 Ray Koopman
12/1/12 Halitsky
12/1/12 Ray Koopman
12/1/12 Halitsky
12/2/12 Ray Koopman
12/2/12 Halitsky
12/3/12 Halitsky
12/3/12 Halitsky
12/3/12 Halitsky
12/3/12 Halitsky
12/3/12 Halitsky
12/3/12 Halitsky
12/3/12 Halitsky
12/3/12 Halitsky
12/3/12 Ray Koopman
12/4/12 Halitsky
12/4/12 Halitsky
12/4/12 Ray Koopman
12/4/12 Halitsky
12/4/12 Ray Koopman
12/5/12 Halitsky
12/4/12 Halitsky
12/4/12 Ray Koopman
12/4/12 Halitsky
12/5/12 Halitsky
12/5/12 Ray Koopman
12/5/12 Halitsky
12/4/12 Halitsky
12/4/12 Halitsky
12/4/12 Ray Koopman

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.