Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Topic: Integral test
Replies: 17   Last Post: Dec 20, 2012 12:29 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Jose Carlos Santos

Posts: 4,873
Registered: 12/4/04
Re: Integral test
Posted: Dec 11, 2012 1:44 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On 11/12/2012 00:57, Rotwang wrote:

>> One of my students asked me today a question that I was unable to
>> answer. Let _f_ be an analytical function from (0,+oo) into [1,+oo) and
>> suppose that the integral of _f_ from 1 to +oo converges. Does it follow
>> that the series sum_n f(n) converges? I don't think so, but I was unable
>> to find a counter-example. Any ideas?

>
> (I'm assuming you mean [0, +oo) instead of [1, +oo).)
>
> Here's a proposal for constructing a counterexample; I don't know enough
> analysis to be able to say whether the resulting function is analytic,
> but it seems plausible.
>
> Let m(x) be an increasing analytic function from (0, oo) to [1, +oo),
> such that m(x) > x for all x, and consider the function
>
> f(x) = (cos(2*pi*x)/2 + 1/2)^m(x + 1).
>
> Then f(n) = 1 for all n in N+. Note that the integral from n - 1/2 to n
> + 1/2 of f(x) satisfies
>
> int_{n - 1/2}^{n + 1/2} f(x) dx
> <= int_{n - 1/2}^{n + 1/2} (cos(2*pi*x)/2 + 1/2)^m(n) dx
> = int_0^1 sin(pi*x)^{2*m(n)} dx
> <= 1/2^(2n) + int_{1/2 - delta(n)}^{1/2 + delta(n)} dx
> = 1/2^(2n) + 2*delta(n)
>
> where delta(n) is chosen so that sin(pi/2 + pi*delta)^(2*m(n)) = 1/2.
> Therefore, if we can choose m in such a way that delta(n) <= 1/2^n, for
> example, then f will be integrable. To this end we can take
>
> m(x) = -log(2)/(2*log(cos(pi/2^{x + c})))
>
> where c > 0 is chosen so as to make m(x) sufficiently well-behaved for
> small x.


Thanks. I will check the details.

Best regards,

Jose Carlos Santos




Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.