On 11 Dez., 12:54, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz <spamt...@library.lspace.org.invalid> wrote: > In <virgil-2FC1D7.13530210122...@BIGNEWS.USENETMONSTER.COM>, on > 12/10/2012 > at 01:53 PM, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> said: > > >In order to define the product of a real number times a > >transfinite, the definition must hold for all reals and all > >transfinites. > > There's a more fundamental problem; she/he/it is conflating cardinals,
Cantor was a male. So "he" would be appropriate.
By the way: Have you understood my convergence-proof of first semester level?