Virgil
Posts:
4,482
Registered:
1/6/11
|
|
Re: fom - 01 - preface
Posted:
Dec 12, 2012 2:42 AM
|
|
In article
<3a1910d9-7a3d-4370-9a7e-343e6bdec80c@x20g2000vbf.googlegroups.com>,
WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
> On 11 Dez., 12:54, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
> <spamt...@library.lspace.org.invalid> wrote:
> > In <virgil-2FC1D7.13530210122...@BIGNEWS.USENETMONSTER.COM>, on
> > 12/10/2012
> > at 01:53 PM, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> said:
> >
> > >In order to define the product of a real number times a
> > >transfinite, the definition must hold for all reals and all
> > >transfinites.
> >
> > There's a more fundamental problem; she/he/it is conflating cardinals,
>
> Cantor was a male. So "he" would be appropriate.
It is hardly clear from the snipped quote from my post that he/she/it
necessarily refers to Cantor.
>
> By the way: Have you understood my convergence-proof of first semester
> level?
Every "proof" of yours that I remember has been flawed.
What was your error in that one?
--
|
|
