On 12 Dez., 12:07, Alan Smaill <sma...@SPAMinf.ed.ac.uk> wrote: > WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> writes: > > On 11 Dez., 12:54, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz > > <spamt...@library.lspace.org.invalid> wrote: > >> In <virgil-2FC1D7.13530210122...@BIGNEWS.USENETMONSTER.COM>, on > >> 12/10/2012 > >> at 01:53 PM, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> said: > > >> >In order to define the product of a real number times a > >> >transfinite, the definition must hold for all reals and all > >> >transfinites. > > >> There's a more fundamental problem; she/he/it is conflating cardinals, > > > Cantor was a male. So "he" would be appropriate. > > And the problem is passed over in silence by WM.
No, I mentioned the problem that Shmuel cannot even calculate limits of sipmle sequences. And again I mention the problem that you cannot read simple texts: See: Grundlagen einer allgemeinen Mannigfaltigkeitslehre (Leipzig 1883)] There he writes: "da doch auf diese Weise eine bestimmte Erweiterung des reellen Zahlengebietes in das Unendlichgroße erreicht ist" My translation: Since in this manner a definite extension of the real domain of numbers into the infinitely large has been accomplished.