|
|
Re: fom - 01 - preface
Posted:
Dec 12, 2012 2:07 PM
|
|
On 12 Dez., 17:07, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
<spamt...@library.lspace.org.invalid> wrote:
> In <virgil-7E972C.00424412122...@BIGNEWS.USENETMONSTER.COM>, on
> 12/12/2012
> at 12:42 AM, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> said:
>
> >It is hardly clear from the snipped quote from my post that
> >he/she/it necessarily refers to Cantor.
>
> In fact, it should have been clear the "s/h/it" referred to WM. It was
> not Cantor who made the claim.
So you are not only a coward who is unable to admit that s/h/it has
made a mistake (or is unable to perform first semester proofs), but
also too uncultured to know what s/h/it talks about.
Cantor said: Die bisherige Darstellung meiner Untersuchungen in der
Mannigfaltigkeitslehre ist an einen Punkt gelangt, wo ihre Fortführung
von einer Erweiterung des realen ganzen Zahlbegriffs (extension of the
notion of real whole numbers) über die bisherigen Grenzen hinaus
abhängig wird, und zwar fällt diese Erweiterung in eine Richtung, in
welcher sie meines Wissens bisher noch von niemandem gesucht worden
ist.
But I see that the average matheologian is very unknowledgeable. In
some respects that is satisfactory for me.
Regards, WM
|
|
