On 12 Dez., 22:10, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:
> > The issue is this: > > Every partial tree from level 0 to level n has > > -1 + 2^(n+1) nodes. > > The number of all finite paths is the same, because every finite path > > ends at some node. > > The number of all path traversing the complete partial tree and > > branching after that in two paths is > > 2^(n+1). > > In the limit we have > > numbers of paths traversing the complete tree (and after that > > branching in two paths) divided by number of nodes of the complete > > tree = 1. > > How does a path which has finished traversing the complete tree have any > further branching possible?
If that is impossible, we have only half of the number. > > It is a stupid self-contradiction to claim that a process which has been > completed will then continue beyond its completion.
Yes. it is stupid to claim that after *all* nodes are covered by finite paths there are yet more infinite paths possible.
