The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Compactification
Replies: 15   Last Post: Mar 17, 2013 6:11 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
William Elliot

Posts: 2,637
Registered: 1/8/12
Re: Compactification
Posted: Dec 13, 2012 3:41 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On Wed, 12 Dec 2012, David C. Ullrich wrote:
> William Elliot <> wrote:

> >(h,Y is a (Hausdorff) compactification of X when h:X -> Y is an embedding,
> >Y is a compact (Hausdorff) space and h(X) is a dense subset of Y.
> >
> >Why the extra luggage of the embedding for the definition of
> >compactification? Why isn't the definition simply
> > Y is a compactification of X when there's some
> > embedding h:X -> Y for which h(X) is a dense subset of Y?

> >I see no advantage to the first definition. The second definition
> >has the advantage of being simpler and more intuitive.

> I disagree.
> The intuition is that "Y is compact and X is a dense subset of Y".
> Except that X is not literally a subset of Y. Saying that the
> compactification is h explains clearly exactly how one is
> to think of X as a subset of Y even though it's not.
> Say X is the set of rationals in (0,1) and Y = [3,4].
> With your second definition, Y is a compactification
> of X. But there are many different things you could
> mean by that! What actual subset of Y is the
> one that you're identifying with X?

Why is that important? Different embeddings don't
change Y nor the denseness of the embedded X.

Of course, constructionists would require the embedding but
certainly others shouldn't need an explicated embedding.

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.