Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math.independent

Topic: Compactification
Replies: 15   Last Post: Mar 17, 2013 6:11 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
William Elliot

Posts: 1,436
Registered: 1/8/12
Re: Compactification
Posted: Dec 13, 2012 3:47 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On Wed, 12 Dec 2012, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz wrote:
> In <Pine.NEB.4.64.1212112003320.6609@panix2.panix.com>, on 12/11/2012
> at 08:13 PM, William Elliot <marsh@panix.com> said:
>

> >Why the extra luggage of the embedding for the definition of
> >compactification? Why isn't the definition simply
> > Y is a compactification of X when there's some
> > embedding h:X -> Y for which h(X) is a dense subset of Y?

>
> Because in general there is more than one such imbedding.


So what? In general there's more than one element in a cofactor,
more that one cluster point of a sequence within a compact space.





Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.