Search All of the Math Forum:
Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by
NCTM or The Math Forum.


Math Forum
»
Discussions
»
sci.math.*
»
sci.math
Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.
Topic:
Compactification
Replies:
15
Last Post:
Mar 17, 2013 6:11 AM




Re: Compactification
Posted:
Dec 14, 2012 4:14 PM


In message <09712de97a3f4b08b876a465c640cf1e@googlegroups.com>, Arturo Magidin <magidin@member.ams.org> writes >The onepoint compactification is a quotient of the 2point >compactification. Any map that extends to the onepoint >compactification will necessarily extend to the 2 point >compactification.
...but not viceversa. The only compactification to which every suitable map extends is the StoneCech. Some even define it by that property ( en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stone?C(ech_compactification ). So it is hardly a "usual" property of compactifications.
Going back to the original question, there doesn't seem to be much point in empathising the embedding used unless different embeddings in the same compact space can give different compactifications. I.e. is it possible to have two compact spaces Y and Z each containing a dense subspace X such that Y and Z are homeomorphic but there is no homeomorphism between them which is the identity on X.
... and that is indeed possible. For example, consider two twopoint compactifications of N. one the sum of the onepoint compactifications of the odds and the evens, the other of the onepoint compactifications of the primes and the composites.
IS it possible to have two homeomorphic compactifications of X such that no homeomorphism f:Y > Z has f(X) = X ? or such that Y\X and Z\X are not homeomorphic ?  David Hartley



