The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Simple random number generator?
Replies: 24   Last Post: Jan 7, 2013 10:52 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Michael Press

Posts: 2,137
Registered: 12/26/06
Re: Simple random number generator?
Posted: Dec 20, 2012 3:15 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

In article <>,
Phil Carmody <> wrote:

> Michael Press <> writes:
> > In article
> > <>,
> > Ben Bacarisse <> wrote:
> >

> > > Good quality, hardware-generated random number sequences (if our current
> > > understanding of quantum effects is correct) are random in a different
> > > way to the digits of pi. It helps if the terminology is be able to
> > > distinguish between them.

> >
> > I do not see how quantum effects can be used to generate
> > random sequences. Coherent systems are stable and highly,
> > if not perfectly, predictable.
> >
> > Hardware generated random sequences usually read Schottky
> > noise off some device (a sound card in a computer) and use
> > that. This can be modeled using entirely classical physics.

> Are you sure? Shottky noise is white noise, and thus is
> indistinguishable from thermal (Johnson-Nyquist) noise.
> So you can statistically model it the same way, but that
> doesn't mean it's actually caused by classical mechanics.
> I can't find any references to Shottky noise that don't
> mention some quantum effect.

_What_ quantum effect? So far I am the only one who
does not gloss over this question. That `quantum
effects' are involved does not imply that they
beget stochastic effects.

Experiment and analysis of time series show that
radioactive decay has an unexplained component. Further
this unexplained component is no more complicated or
less simple than diffusion across a membrane. Bluntly,
equivalent to deflation of a bicycle tire.

By `quantum' I read `wave theory of matter'. The
original Bohr theory is as good as we have for what
might actually be happening.

(Personally I do not adhere to any interpretation used
to psychologically make the experiments more palatable;
preferring to confront as best my faculties allow the
raw facts.)

Michael Press

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.