|
|
Re: Simple random number generator?
Posted:
Dec 20, 2012 9:25 PM
|
|
the pioneers have unfortunately confused the duality
of wave & particle, but
you shouldn't "do the math both ways at the same time,
unless it's a two-column proof," or more columns & rows.
Newton is the premier exemplar,
with his sotto voce theory of light,
using Descartes selfsame screwup of Snell's law.
> equivalent to deflation of a bicycle tire.
>
> By `quantum' I read `wave theory of matter'. The
> original Bohr theory is as good as we have for what
> might actually be happening.
> raw facts.)
|
|
