The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.stat.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: kolmogov-smirnov, wilcoxon and kruskal tests
Replies: 14   Last Post: Dec 31, 2012 6:38 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]

Posts: 5
Registered: 12/22/12
Re: kolmogov-smirnov, wilcoxon and kruskal tests
Posted: Dec 23, 2012 4:04 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On Sunday, December 23, 2012 6:27:54 AM UTC+1, Ray Koopman wrote:
> On Dec 22, 5:22 pm, wrote:
> NO. You misunderstand the logic of hypothesis testing. Failing to
> reject a hypothesis does not mean that it is true or that you should
> act as if it were true. It means only that, in the way that the test
> looks at data, your data are not inconsistent with the hypothesis.
> Other tests, that look at the data differently, may well disagree.

Dear Ray,

Thank you very much for clarifying the issue!

Best regards,

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.