|
|
Re: Simple Refutation of Cantor's Proof
Posted:
Dec 24, 2012 10:38 AM
|
|
On 24 Dez., 16:17, George Greene <gree...@email.unc.edu> wrote:
> On Dec 24, 6:29 am, hel...@astro.multiCLOTHESvax.de (Phillip Helbig---
>
> undress to reply) wrote:
> > You are missing the point. The whole idea of the diagonal argument is
>
> No, Phil, YOU are missing the point. YOU ARE NEW.
> Herc has been here FOR A DECADE. YOU should look back.
> Everything you are about to say HAS BEEN SAID a dozen times
> already.
But it has not been understood by most matheologians. They have not
yet understood that everything that happens in a Cantor-list happens
there at a finite distance from the origin (i.e.e from the first
line). And everything that happens thereafter, if any, is completely
irrelevant for the argument. Therefore everything with the argument
can modeled using finite strings, i.e. rational numbers.
But matheologians are so stupid and so fixed on their aim that they
simply do not take notice of rational arguments but continue to insist
on their belief that soemthing will happen in the infinite. Perhaps
they are even hoping that something will be managed tomorrow by the
holy Christ at Christmas.Of course nnothing will happen like during
the recent 2000 years.
But give up all hope to cure the matheologians from their infinite
stupidity, the only thing that actually is really infinite in this
world.
Regards, WM
|
|
