|
|
Re: Simple Refutation of Cantor's Proof
Posted:
Dec 25, 2012 4:55 AM
|
|
In <kbbnuk$elr$1@online.de>, on 12/25/2012
at 08:25 AM, helbig@astro.multiCLOTHESvax.de (Phillip
Helbig---undress to reply) said:
>Right, being in a newsgroup for 10 years automatically means that one
> must have refuted a proof which professional mathematicians believe
>is OK.
Why are you misrepresenting what he wrote? The text that you quoted
does not state that herc is correct.
>Why is he still posting the same stuff after 10 years?
Because he's a netkook, just like the other circle squarers. You may
as well ask why she/he/it crossposts a crank article on Mathematics to
unrelated news groups, or why the Relativity deniers crosspost to
sci.math; they're kooks, and looking for rational explanations is a
mugs game.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT <http://patriot.net/~shmuel>
Unsolicited bulk E-mail subject to legal action. I reserve the
right to publicly post or ridicule any abusive E-mail. Reply to
domain Patriot dot net user shmuel+news to contact me. Do not
reply to spamtrap@library.lspace.org
|
|
