|
|
Re: Simple Refutation of Cantor's Proof
Posted:
Dec 25, 2012 8:30 AM
|
|
On Dec 25, 4:25 pm, hel...@astro.multiCLOTHESvax.de (Phillip Helbig---
undress to reply) wrote:
> In article
> <a8c69f87-5386-49d8-bc4f-088cdfe6a...@p17g2000vbn.googlegroups.com>,
>
> George Greene <gree...@email.unc.edu> writes:
> > On Dec 24, 6:29=A0am, hel...@astro.multiCLOTHESvax.de (Phillip Helbig---
> > undress to reply) wrote:
> > > You are missing the point. =A0The whole idea of the diagonal argument is
>
> > No, Phil, YOU are missing the point. YOU ARE NEW.
> > Herc has been here FOR A DECADE. YOU should look back.
> > Everything you are about to say HAS BEEN SAID a dozen times
> > already.
>
> Right, being in a newsgroup for 10 years automatically means that one
> must have refuted a proof which professional mathematicians believe is
> OK. Right. Conquering usenet is not the same as conquering the world.
>
> Why is he still posting the same stuff after 10 years? Why hasn't he
> submitted it to a journal, won the Fields medal etc?
It's the conspiracy of orthodoxy, numnuts.
|
|
