
Re: Distinguishability of paths of the Infinite Binary tree???
Posted:
Dec 27, 2012 6:31 AM


On 26/12/2012 5:03 PM, fom wrote:
> On 12/26/2012 2:34 PM, Virgil wrote:
>> Or does WM claim a definition of countability other than the standard >> one? >> > > He does. He stated it. > > A set is countable iff it is a subset of a countable set.
This definition is, of course, circular, and should convince anyone who reads it that the writer of this "definition" does not understand the first points of mathematics.
> Infinite sets are, therefore, if they exist, uncountable.
And this is a nonsequitur.
> Claims of nonexistence, of course, are just as metaphysical > as claims of existence. WM is an empiricist.
WM is a fool. An arrogant, blustering, uneducable fool.

