|
|
Re: Distinguishability of paths of the Infinite Binary tree???
Posted:
Dec 27, 2012 6:31 AM
|
|
On 26/12/2012 5:03 PM, fom wrote:
> On 12/26/2012 2:34 PM, Virgil wrote:
>> Or does WM claim a definition of countability other than the standard
>> one?
>>
>
> He does. He stated it.
>
> A set is countable iff it is a subset of a countable set.
This definition is, of course, circular, and should convince anyone who
reads it that the writer of this "definition" does not understand the
first points of mathematics.
> Infinite sets are, therefore, if they exist, uncountable.
And this is a non-sequitur.
> Claims of non-existence, of course, are just as metaphysical
> as claims of existence. WM is an empiricist.
WM is a fool. An arrogant, blustering, uneducable fool.
|
|
