Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math.independent

Topic: The Diagonal Argument
Replies: 28   Last Post: Dec 29, 2012 12:11 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Graham Cooper

Posts: 4,293
Registered: 5/20/10
Re: The Diagonal Argument
Posted: Dec 28, 2012 3:44 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On Dec 28, 2:10 pm, George Greene <gree...@email.unc.edu> wrote:
> On Dec 26, 2:43 pm, Graham Cooper <grahamcoop...@gmail.com> wrote:
>

> > Try to Visualise an example.
>
> YOU DON'T *HAVE* ANY *EXAMPLES*, *DUMBASS*!!
> *YOU* ARE *NOT* the one TEACHING this class!  *I* AM!!
>


*piffle*



>
> > L(x,y)
> > +---------------->
> > | 0. 2 3 4 5 6 7 ..
> > | 0. 9 8 7 6 5 5 ..
> > | 0. 1 2 3 1 2 3 ..
> > | 0. 9 8 9 8 9 8 ..
> > | 0. 6 5 6 5 6 5 ..
> > | 0. 5 6 5 6 5 6 ..
> > |
> > v

>
> > Now apply your FLIP(d) function to the whole plane
>
> > T(x,y)
> > +---------------->
> > | 0. 6 6 6 6 5 5 ..
> > | 0. 5 5 5 5 6 6 ..
> > | 0. 6 6 6 6 6 6 ..
> > | 0. 5 5 5 5 5 5 ..
> > | 0. 5 6 5 6 5 6 ..
> > | 0. 6 5 6 5 6 5 ..
> > |
> > v

>
> > Your claim is that is you take any path from
>
> > T(1,?)
> > T(2,?)
> > T(3,?)
> > ...

>
> > and repeat that process you must end up with an infinite string absent
> > from L?

>
> NO, DUMBASS, THAT IS NOT ANYbody's claim.




Then you agree

0. T(1,2) T(2,1) T(3,3) T(4,4) T(5,5) T(6,6) ...

is potentially ON THE LIST L!

THANK YOU and Good Night!

Herc



Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.