Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math.independent

Topic: The Diagonal Argument
Replies: 28   Last Post: Dec 29, 2012 12:11 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Virgil

Posts: 6,972
Registered: 1/6/11
Re: The Diagonal Argument
Posted: Dec 28, 2012 4:18 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

In article
<4bf7b763-8100-46af-be9d-90187b0f80ff@s10g2000pbg.googlegroups.com>,
Graham Cooper <grahamcooper7@gmail.com> wrote:

> Then you agree
>
> 0. T(1,2) T(2,1) T(3,3) T(4,4) T(5,5) T(6,6) ...
>
> is potentially ON THE LIST L!


But, if T(n,n) is as I previously defined it,
0. T(1,1) T(2,2) T(3,3) T(4,4) T(5,5) T(6,6) ...
is not even potentially on it.
--





Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.