Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: The Diagonal Argument
Replies: 28   Last Post: Dec 29, 2012 12:11 AM

 Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
 Virgil Posts: 8,833 Registered: 1/6/11
Re: The Diagonal Argument
Posted: Dec 28, 2012 8:26 PM

In article
Graham Cooper <grahamcooper7@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Dec 28, 7:18 pm, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:
> > In article
> >  Graham Cooper <grahamcoop...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >

> > > Then you agree
> >
> > > 0. T(1,2) T(2,1) T(3,3) T(4,4) T(5,5) T(6,6) ...
> >
> > > is potentially ON THE LIST L!
> >
> > But, if T(n,n) is as I previously defined it,
> > 0. T(1,1) T(2,2) T(3,3) T(4,4) T(5,5) T(6,6) ...
> > is not even potentially on it.
> >

>
> HERE IS L
>
> L(x,y)
> +---------------->
> | 0. 2 3 4 5 6 7 ..
> | 0. 9 8 7 6 5 5 ..
> | 0. 1 2 3 1 2 3 ..
> | 0. 9 8 9 8 9 8 ..
> | 0. 6 5 6 5 6 5 ..
> | 0. 5 6 5 6 5 6 ..
> |
> v
>
> HERE IS T
>
> T(x,y)
> +---------------->
> | 0. 6 6 6 6 5 5 ..
> | 0. 5 5 5 5 6 6 ..
> | 0. 6 6 6 6 6 6 ..
> | 0. 5 5 5 5 5 5 ..
> | 0. 5 6 5 6 5 6 ..
> | 0. 6 5 6 5 6 5 ..
> |
> v

That is not my "T".

My "T(x,y)" gives a single row:

0. 6 5 6 5 5 5 ... ..
--

Date Subject Author
12/26/12 Graham Cooper
12/26/12 Virgil
12/26/12 george
12/26/12 Virgil
12/26/12 Graham Cooper
12/27/12 Graham Cooper
12/27/12 Virgil
12/27/12 Graham Cooper
12/27/12 ross.finlayson@gmail.com
12/27/12 Graham Cooper
12/28/12 Virgil
12/28/12 ross.finlayson@gmail.com
12/28/12 Virgil
12/28/12 ross.finlayson@gmail.com
12/28/12 Virgil
12/28/12 ross.finlayson@gmail.com
12/29/12 Virgil
12/28/12 Virgil
12/28/12 Virgil
12/28/12 Graham Cooper
12/28/12 Virgil
12/28/12 Graham Cooper
12/28/12 Virgil
12/28/12 Graham Cooper
12/29/12 Virgil
12/28/12 Graham Cooper
12/29/12 Virgil
12/26/12 J. Antonio Perez M.