Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math.independent

Topic: The Diagonal Argument
Replies: 28   Last Post: Dec 29, 2012 12:11 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]

Posts: 924
Registered: 2/15/09
Re: The Diagonal Argument
Posted: Dec 28, 2012 10:07 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On Dec 28, 5:13 pm, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:
> In article
> <01f18004-18e2-429a-b93b-bbbde1129...@t6g2000pba.googlegroups.com>,
>  "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlay...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > Hancher, the "puke parrot" bit is largely for comedic effect, yes it
> > seems clear that you do actually read the attempts of others to
> > develop frameworks and structures of what would be developments in
> > mathematics, but it is as well clear that you definitely have a
> > penchant for tearing down said arguments without building them up.

> It is the duty of every mathematician to tear down such bad mathematics
> as is thrust upon him or her.
> And both you and WM thrust a lot of it here.
> --

Cantor's nested intervals theorem <-> Finlayson's EF as counterexample
Cantor's antidiagonal argument <-> Finlayson's EF as counterexample
continued fractions <-> Finlayson's EF as counterexample
Cantor's indicator function theorem <-> Finlayson's symmetrical
mapping as counterexample
Zuhair's binary tree theorem <-> Finlayson's BT = EF as counterexample
Cantor's powerset theorem <-> Finlayson's powerset as order type as
successor construction, and a dialetheic ur-element
Russell's negated correlates <-> Finlayson's note on statement of
structurally true languages
irrationals uncountable <-> Finlayson's "A function surjects the
rationals onto the irrationals"

I've been busy. And, that's not bad mathematics.

Now, I am very interested in:

a) results standardly establishing uncountability
b) applications solely due transfinite cardinals

Basically, that's with the notion that this symmetry between limit
ordinals has particular results for the diagonal arguments and may
well be a general consideration about them, and particularly a
generally unique result about them, and then, that applications solely
due transfinite cardinals would be of incredible interest for the
possibility they might advance science in, say, physics.


Ross Finlayson

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.