On Dec 30, 6:48 am, quasi <qu...@null.set> wrote: > John Jens wrote: > >... =http://primemath.wordpress.com/ > > The obvious error is your claim that a < p. > > But that error was previously pointed out to you. > > And yet you repost the same nonsense. > > Did you really fail to understand the previous objections? > > Or are you simply trolling? > > quasi
I also pointed out that modular considerations, such as the one he is using, are known NOT TO WORK. One can not lift results from a local field (i.e. mod p) to a global one (i.e. Q) because SHA is an obstruction to the Hasse- Minkowski theorem.