The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Mathematics as discourse about form:
Replies: 12   Last Post: Jan 2, 2013 11:04 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]

Posts: 1,635
Registered: 2/27/06
Re: Mathematics as discourse about form:
Posted: Jan 1, 2013 5:16 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On Jan 1, 3:06 pm, Virgil <> wrote:
> In article
> <>,
>  Charlie-Boo <> wrote:

> > What is the difference between math and the other branches of science?
> For one thing, mathematics is not a 'branch' of science!
> For example, which theorems of mathematics does one ever "prove" by
> experimentation or by its conforming to physical evidence?
> --

If proof is your gauge, then math wins over physics and the other
physical sciences hands down. Non-math science can never prove its
conclusions. They are approximate and history shows there is always a
lower level that hasn't been considered yet - Newton was trumped by
Einstein and no physical experiment can be conducted without
interfering with the results you are attempting to measure.

What reasonable definition of science excludes mathematics? How do
you define science? I say, science is that which is predictable. And
that includes math.


Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.