|
|
Re: This Is a Failed *PROOF* that AD never produces a New Digit Sequence!
Posted:
Jan 1, 2013 4:46 PM
|
|
In <kbu8cc$edu$1@dont-email.me>, on 01/01/2013 at 06:56 PM, "INFINITY POWER" <infinity@limited.com> said:
>Right! This is VERY TRIVIAL PROOF and points [3] and [4] are >TRIVIALLY CORRECT!
>segment = finite sequence of digits
>[3] every segment of every finite size can be listed.
>[4] every SEQUENCE of segments can be listed
>by induction, a SEQUENCE of SEQUENCE OF DIGITS >is a SEQUENCE of DIGITS!
Not even close. What is true is that given a sequence of segments there is a sequence that is the concatenation of all of the segments.
-- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT <http://patriot.net/~shmuel>
Unsolicited bulk E-mail subject to legal action. I reserve the right to publicly post or ridicule any abusive E-mail. Reply to domain Patriot dot net user shmuel+news to contact me. Do not reply to spamtrap@library.lspace.org
|
|